Skip to main content

Oracle VirtualBox - first (short) impressions

I am using Oracle VirtualBox now since a couple of weeks in order to establish if it can replace my VMWare Server.

I want to put down a couple of quick impressions - which will hopefully be followed up by some more insight.

Speed:
It seems that Oracle VirtualBox is faster than the VMWare Server. Creating an image as well as starting it up and shutting it down are pretty fast. However if your machine is pushing the limits on memory the shutdown process of an image can easily take 5 minutes.

FAT/NTFS:
I have not yet found the possibility to create a disk file in chunks of 2GB. VMWare offered this OOTB. Now when I move my image from my Windows7 NTFS filesystem to the FAT external disk it complains about a 20GB file. More research is needed here.

Distributing images:
I copied the images and gave them to some colleagues during several trainings. My experience is that the different laptops we use are not handled well by VirtualBox. E.g. I had to remove a network from the vbox-file in order to just start an image on a different laptop.

Stay tuned for more.
Labels:

Comments

Martien van den Akker said…
Hi Andreas,

Are you still on VMWare Server? Didn't you look into VMWare Player? I found (under Linux) that it is faster and more flexible. And has a by far smaller footprint. I also found that VMWare Server was not compatible with the latest FireFox. Actually VMWare Player is quite comparable to VirtualBox.

You should be able to use VMWare Virtual Disks in VirtualBox. Did that in VB3 once.

Main reason I use VB more is because of the appliances of Oracle. But I have VB and VMWare Player side-by-side.
8:59 AM
Andreas said…
Hi martien!

I never used the VMWare Player as it is not supporting what I do most - creating images.

The firefox issue bugged me, but I use the IE for that.
7:56 PM
eMarcelCom said…
Hi Andreas,

I know Virtual Box from old days. It was always fast but compared to VMware is still missing some features, like mentioned disk files splitting for FAT file systems.

I'm surprised you are saying that VMware Player doesn't support image creation. I've just created an image on my laptop and I run VMware® Player 3.1.3 build-324285.

The only one minus I've found in Player vs. vmware server is that you can't run vmplayer as a service - an application has to be running while vmserver works as an OS service.


Cheers!!
1:15 PM
Andreas said…
Hi Marcin!

I didn't know that VMWare Player supports building images. Previously that was something that only worked in the VMWare Server or Workstation.

cu
Andreas
7:55 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oracle Fusion Middleware Forum in Valencia

Last week the 22nd Fusion Middleware and PaaS Partner Community Forum took place in Valencia, Spain. For me this was a very valuable experience - again as I have visited a number of #ofmForum before. Let me recap here the highlights of this meeting. After a great Welcome-Reception the evening before, where everybody had the chance to catch up with a large number of old (and soon-to-be new) friends, the conference started with a kind of the state of the union by Jürgen Kress. The community already has more than 8000 people. This - in a fact - is a tremendous achievement. Everybody agrees that this is only possible by the relentless work of Jürgen who puts a big effort into this. It shows that other areas inside the Oracle technology stack do not benefit by equivalent communities. Even other communities, when they exist at all, do not compete in the same league. So a VERY BIG THANK YOU for Jürgen is at its place here. After the opening a keynote from Alistair Hopkins showed ver...
Post a Comment
Read more

Paas Summercamp 2017 in Lisbon

So – another summer camp is over. What was the outcome of this? Was there more to it than meeting some old friends, dive into some slides, get your hands dirty on new versions and finally talk about it over a glass of Portuguese wine or beer? So let’s start at the beginning – where are we right now? In the Process Cloud Service track the global PM Nathan Angstadt kicked of the session by asking how many projects we are on that use PCS and how we get along selling the product. The outcome was somewhat predictable: about one or two participants were on PCS projects, and selling is still a big issue. We discussed the various reasons for that. The main essence was that the PCS is often positioned at previous BPM customers who still have to deal with large BPM implementations and are somewhat afraid of the new PCS-style. BPM and PCS are two different things. They target different customer issues. BPM is still useful when it comes to large scale implementation...
Post a Comment
Read more

USB2 for Logitech wireless keyboard/mouse

I have bought an Acer E17 laptop. Also I redecorated my study room - so I wanted to get rid of all the clutter, plus sharing the desk with my wife and use the big screen I have - which sat idle on my old desk. So I thought to get a docking station. Just a brief check on the underside of the Acer's (I have three now) showed me that they are not in the league of grown-ups when it comes to the point of supplying docking station slots. So I tried to use a wireless keyboard and mouse from Logitech which I bought a year ago. However there was sometime a big lag in the keyboard and also the mouse did not react that well. Looking on the internet I found a number of folks who complained about this but only little help in solving the problem. Finally I stumbled over a posting that stated that USB2 would be a better choice than USB3, as this scans more devices on more frequencies. So I put the receiver in the USB2 port and since then I am a happy computer user again, not wishing to ...
Post a Comment
Read more